From: David Menendez <dave@zednenem.com>

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Yitzchak Gale <gale@sefer.org> wrote:

>  It is a common idiom to write a sequence of composed combinators in
>  reverse order to the way they would be written with ($) or (.). That
>  naturally expresses the idea of the combinators as operations being
>  applied in the given order.
>

I think the bar should be pretty high before we add a third way to write
function application to base. How common is this? Common among whom? Why
can't the existing idioms of (.) and ($) work just as well?