On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 05.12.2014, 14:09 -0800 schrieb Eric Mertens:
> Would it be significantly better than just having/using the following
> definition?
>
> unzipF :: Functor f => f (a, b) -> (f a, f b)
> unzipF x = (fmap fst x, fmap snd x)

yes, I guess that would be sufficient. Something for Data.Functor?

This looks like it should be the default implementation of an Unzippable class, rather than a standalone function.