Greg, Johan, that&#39;s not the proposal at the end of the thread as of last night :-)<span></span><br><br>On Thursday, April 24, 2014, Johan Tibell &lt;<a href="mailto:johan.tibell@gmail.com">johan.tibell@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Gregory Collins <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;greg@gregorycollins.net&#39;);" target="_blank">greg@gregorycollins.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>


<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:38 AM, wren romano <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;winterkoninkje@gmail.com&#39;);" target="_blank">winterkoninkje@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>



<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow:hidden">I believe we&#39;ve reached a consensus that no defaults is superior to<br>

error defaults. And I agree! So that&#39;s one bird down :)</div></blockquote></div><br></div>If I understand correctly, that&#39;s going to break user code without a deprecation cycle and as such gets an enthusiastic -1 from me.</div>


</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If that&#39;s the case, -1 from me too. Breaking user code for a change which is useful to a tiny minority is not worth it.</div><div><br></div><div>Otherwise I&#39;m +1 having the functions in general.</div>


<div><br></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote>