Heh, I suppose that doesn't help my case much, does it? I "derived" the name for my own uses many times prior to seeing it elsewhere (most notably Reflex: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/reflex/docs/Reflex-Class.html#v:ffor). Like I said, the name "ffor" isn't wildly important IMO. I don't want to start the "fmap should be map" debate all over again either.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:51 PM, John Wiegley <johnw@newartisans.com> wrote:

>>>>> "EC" == Elliot Cameron <eacameron@gmail.com> writes:

EC> FWIW, I'm less concerned about the precise name of ffor, although it seems
EC> sad to to lose the obvious correlation with fmap.

Ah, it wasn't until you said that that I understood why "ffor", but now it
makes some sense. :)

--
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries