We had both me and you weigh in on having both .Strict and .Lazy for consistency with the other libraries, and Milan weigh in on the other side.<div><br></div><div>Going by a sheer vote count, then I think it&#39;d be settled. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Milan?</div><div><br></div><div>-Edward</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Johan Tibell <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:johan.tibell@gmail.com">johan.tibell@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Milan Straka <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:fox@ucw.cz" target="_blank">fox@ucw.cz</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div>We got opinions only from the proponent and both maintainers.</div>
I interpret the silence as the community being happy with the change.</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Me too. Did we settle the issue of having both .Strict and .Lazy. I think we should.</div><div><br></div><font color="#888888"><div>
-- Johan</div>

<div><br></div></font></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>