Right, and people here are talking about adding Functor for up to 15-tuples, unless I misread.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:07 PM Edward Kmett <ekmett@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Oliver Charles <ollie@ocharles.org.uk> wrote:

I'm not sure I even want to propose this, but if you're going to make it consistent for all tuples, should you also make Bifunctor consistent for all tuples?

 

The Bifunctor instances are already defined out to 7-tuples or so.

-Edward

 

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM Alexander Berntsen <alexander@plaimi.net> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 19/01/16 21:54, Alois Cochard wrote:
> I'm in favor of this proposal for consistency sake.
As am I. Inconsistency seems like laziness at best, and poorly thought
through at worst.

- --
Alexander
alexander@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWn4IFAAoJENQqWdRUGk8Bbs4P/RVit2hXVpWn6AaK+zgA8KOA
pHyzK93KY+ASLbaWEzsMYwtoreYY1/Rd+xby1St35QGiJm6gEr+LME2LWfWITOur
GlPrAWUps/TqipA49JioVKMMOwqub6mcVXisLZt8DGe84pZNarzZXUBh5FGblkGm
tZg2tsNT9QEUjodAVi0yf1P+wHNaDz9XaX8/upKMYjkW4tZyeldMky+HBvwBJ8XM
feQ3tOTK5dgHPM0ssmUIAVIlL1z0VUmJ6skSNBfQotkCnQRE3uHFagXsCPMGe7gV
9jvLJ1ZHLXFWdS3KtT2UMUzmdQPmygwWCc9jOWZsJr4ndoKBKYConmmYs+Vzvy2x
xKqDrHVuKOcEgOOkTHSdXnsw6Wdjs0N9Vw5mc+zFeymf9NoWJeqgijKfInS+jR0b
yNYYoVILFY22ISua89dRws0+Ky9gCWkKIbu/+uCteFlXoMv3j60LnmUuoZ3kY+bp
H5+c4v3sEObjItbYsRLEo6KiACC1I1bhFJm16+XipAgY0N31R4R9Hr6sCo+yWa2l
9bNJn8KJ/p9N2JZMRUzo2KVwet9VpGq9PP90DDuwf+Nz3xYttWGIUFRgec7OzmHo
lYfUWqAtbOP0XguprV2fbxb9Ye3JF0RdqlVoRJCtAlppEkqmu0w8NEt3Uye+ZTkq
2FQ1Dqbh8LiC9dZXNuSD
=Cep6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries