On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Felipe Lessa <felipe.lessa@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Milan Straka <fox@ucw.cz> wrote:
> I in fact expected this outcome -- it is not inlining itself that is
> beneficial, it is the _specialization_ (which happens during inlining if
> possible).

Does that mean that instead of INLINEABLE, we need SPECIALIZABLE?

Yes, this was a point Johan was trying to make when this came up a few weeks ago.