You&#39;re absolutely right. That plus better support tooling are what&#39;s needed. Just need to put the time in. <div><br></div><div>Can we all shift this thread back to helping get Haskell platform ready?<span></span><br>
<br>On Wednesday, April 9, 2014, Tom Ellis &lt;<a href="mailto:tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk">tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
As a somewhat uninformed observer, I can&#39;t help thinking that &quot;upper bounds<br>
on all packages plus cabal having the ability to ignore all upper bounds&quot; is<br>
the best of both worlds.<br>
<br>
Am I missing something?<br>
<br>
Tom<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;Libraries@haskell.org&#39;)">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
</blockquote></div>