Utimately the libraries@ submission process is about achieving consensus as much as possible, rather than just up and down vote tallying. Needlessly fragmenting all discussion on a given topic into microscopically detailed threads makes it very difficult to follow the sweep of opinion. To that end I would encourage people to be clear about what parts of a given proposal you like or dislike rather than just say +1 or -1 without indicating why.This captures the essence of the library submissions process as we have it described below.-EdwardOn Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey all,if you agree that new proposals should be voted on in new/distinct threads (though can certainly be hammered out before hand), please chime in. This seems to come up a lot (at least in my naive following of the list) and if a new proposal appears in a thread you've already voted on, its hard to know curretlythoughts?On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Alexander Berntsen <alexander@plaimi.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
+1 ;-)
On 20/04/14 23:37, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> can the people with new proposals do new threads, adding ammendments
> inline to a preexisting thread makes it really hard
>
> a) to know who supports what
> b) make it visible to folks who've
> started ignoring the thread they've already voted on
- --
Alexander
alexander@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlNVB0wACgkQRtClrXBQc7UeSwEAqDC7LhAmeG2mNmSDQ9D33ulE
+WIBcp4t66nD8H519XwA/jtSYbEZ+oq2DdtXIxAWDSeNDn53XyOiZdR4vpFCPzTm
=cFB+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries