There is also a poll with er.. somewhat biased wording that was being floated around the #haskell channel that has received 100+ responses if you want a broader spectrum response, even if its not very scientific.

Form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lKckA0pA6K4uQ-UnnmjRR32PKHph0WeZoQeVTTQJZ4I/viewform

Results: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lKckA0pA6K4uQ-UnnmjRR32PKHph0WeZoQeVTTQJZ4I/viewanalytics?pli=1

-Edward

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Casey McCann <cam@uptoisomorphism.net> wrote:

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Ian Lynagh <ian@well-typed.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:49:29AM +0800, John Lato wrote:
>>
>> I suggest that we start a poll for a single, concrete proposal. If the
>> poll forum is by email or similar, I further suggest that replies be
>> limited strictly to +1/-1.

Here are the current totals by my count, ignoring any 0s:

> * Generalise Prelude.mapM etc

+13 / -0

> * Remove Prelude.mapM etc

+1 / -11

> * Add more monomorphic variants to Prelude (e.g. whenJust)

+0 / -12

> * Nothing

+0 / -13

- C.

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries