sorry, I didn't understand what the original message was about. I was talking about a long-term direction


On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> wrote:
I don't really care about that goal, to be honest; in this case, I just want a minimal number of existing packages to break when GHC 7.8.1 is released.


On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, Greg Weber wrote:
I would like to reduce the amount of test framework fragmentation. A better path forward might be to use the newer more extensible and well maintained tasty package. I am imagining it is trivial to create a compatibility layer with the previous test-framework or to find and replace, but that might not be the case.