Well, I'm looking to define liftM = liftA, liftM2 = liftA2, liftM3 = liftA3, and (with a modified definition of ap) I'm getting that to work, but that leaves liftM4 and liftM5 hanging.

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:30 PM, John Lato <jwlato@gmail.com> wrote:

Does anyone actually want these? I would have thought we should go the other way and deprecate `liftM3+` in favor of using `<*>`.

On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 10:26:36 AM David Feuer <david.feuer@gmail.com> wrote:
Since Applicative is supposed to be important now, I figure we should get these in.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries