On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Vincent Hanquez <tab@snarc.org> wrote:
Last, I don't have the luxury of time, and as the single maintainer of 16 packages of many thousands line of code (and many other packages if you don't count tls/crypto), I'ld rather spend my free unpaid time doing something useful (adding features, bugfixing,..) for the many currents users [1], than playing the upper-bound-catch-up game. When those rare breakage happens I get notification from the wonderful stackage and usually fix it in the day or so.

And re: this point: I don't have enough time for an epic mailing list flamewar today :), but I will say:
And as a side note: please don't get me wrong, I am very happy that you guys are doing all this work for the community and publishing all of these nice high-quality packages, and I as a package author myself I appreciate how much time goes into bumping version bounds. I just wish we could solve that root issue with better tooling rather than mortgaging the future. Without upper bounds on deps, lim_{t -> ∞} P(build-ok) = 0 :(

--
Gregory Collins <greg@gregorycollins.net>