On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Daniel Trstenjak <daniel.trstenjak@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:50:24AM +0100, Johan Tibell wrote:
> What would be the strict version of <$>?

In my case, it's more about the intuition of the name '<$!>' and less
about the possibility of a strict version of '<$>'.

What's unintuitive about the definition of <$!> above? It's seems like the only sensible one.