Sure, but I figured there was no pain in going through the ceremony of it all. ;)
On 2013-08-05 21:06, Edward Kmett wrote:I don't see any argument against that. I'd say this is a no-brainer
> Right now the definition of Control.Monad.void is:
>
> void :: Functor f => f a -> f ()
> void = fmap (const ())
>
> I propose we replace it with
>
> void :: Functor f => f a -> f ()
> void = (() <$)
nobody would mind being done without doing the mailing list thing.
David