On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Johan Tibell
<johan.tibell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Edward Kmett <
ekmett@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was a discussion period on this about 6 months ago. We're just now
> finally getting it all integrated. I'd rather not add new names for the same
> operations.
decisions questioned after the fact, but I think we should still
re-consider them *iff* truly new information is brought forward. I
don't know if that's the case here or not as I didn't follow the
original discussion.
Of course, I wasn't trying to lay down the law.
Just that it was a rather late amendment and to indicate that I was personally on the other side of the divide.
The proposal spoke about mtl, the fact that it impacts transformers was more realized in hindsight.
At the time I'd said I'd get it in, I hadn't realized how much of it actually fell to Ross as the maintainer of transformers.
-Edward