Well, it seems the consensus is high enough that we'll try to go ahead with this. As it affects the Prelude, we may put out another poll / wider broadcast just to avoid any appearance of ambushing folks with another change to the Prelude without announcement, but I think at this point my intent is to pick a path to make this happen.

-Edward


On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley@gmail.com> wrote:
The consensus seems largely to favour the high level proposal to add a
Semigroup class, but there hasn't been much discussion of the
implementation details i.e. what to do about mappend or a
Semigroup-like candidate (problematic for empty lists, of course).



On 29 April 2015 at 12:24, Jeremy <voldermort@hotmail.com> wrote:
> So what's the conclusion on this? We seem to have a strong consensus on going
> ahead with the proposal, and a weaker consensus for doing so via the long
> path.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-Make-Semigroup-as-a-superclass-of-Monoid-tp5767835p5808129.html
> Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries