It might be good to also mention a user's options for using their own fork of a package while waiting for an update on hackage. Part of peoples' frustration seems to be coming from a feeling that they're blocked on waiting for the package to be updated.

Tom


El May 10, 2014, a las 15:35, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald@gmail.com> escribió:

Let's update that policy with your and Edwards remarks?

On Saturday, May 10, 2014, Erik Hesselink <hesselink@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Gershom Bazerman <gershomb@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand that Max did a bunch of very important work, then became
> occupied with other things in the world. And in the long term, that needs to
> be sorted out. But in the short term, a four-day-notice policy is silly. And
> furthermore, even though there's nothing _wrong_ with forking promiscuously,
> it tends to create a mess, to no good end.

Just a small note since this was mentioned a couple of times: as
hackage admins we don't have a 'four-day-notice policy'. The package
takeover procedure [0] just says 'a while', and we've taken this to
mean at least 2-3 weeks to account for vacations, other absences,
general busyness etc.

Erik

[0] http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Taking_over_a_package
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries