+1 Please, please, please can we have this?

> Could we instead have "ffor" which can be used prefix or infix and avoids the operator soup problem?

-1

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:42 AM, Andreas Abel <abela@chalmers.se> wrote:
>>
>> I am using `for`
>>
>>
>> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/Agda-2.5.2/docs/Agda-Utils-Functor.html
>>
>> and I think taking `for` for Applicative was name theft.
>
>
> This crime may no longer be charged under the statute of limitations. The
> federal code provides that no person can be tried or punished for any
> noncapital offense unless they are indicted or information is instituted
> within five years of the date the offense was committed.
>
> Of course, that is here within the U.S. You might have better luck in the
> international court of public opinion. =)
>
> -Edward
>

> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries