I tend to agree. The CLC is a deliberative body with some action components. (The name “committee” is a tell). One wants those smaller to reach consensus sooner. Having more maintainers for “core” and “near-core” packages (and perhaps formalizing more the latter) is very good. Asking these maintainers be on the CLC doesn’t seem to be necessary to solve any proximate problem?

On Feb 17, 2021, 5:47 AM -0500, Alexey Khudaykov <alexey.skladnoy@gmail.com>, wrote:

I think that we should understand what exactly does CLC do? What should it do?