That sounds about right. Data.Maybe is out of the way enough few would object if we extending it to include that function. I'm pretty much +/- 0 on it.

-Edward

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Henning Thielemann <lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:

On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Edward Kmett wrote:

Usually that second op is given a different name. e.g. filterMapM or something.

 If it is a mapMaybe, why not mapMaybeA or mapMaybeM?

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries