Just to clarify here: all I mean is that we should include the word "Partial" in the Haddock documentation -- no deprecation or warning, just documentation.

Richard

> On Aug 30, 2018, at 8:10 PM, Richard Eisenberg <rae@cs.brynmawr.edu> wrote:
>
> Proposal: Mark partial functions in `base` as partial
>
> Motivation: I'm about to teach Haskell to a classful of beginners. In my experience, they will soon reach for functions like `head` and `tail`, because pattern-matching is foreign to them. I would love just to be able to say "Don't use partial functions", but many students will not easily be able to tell partial functions from total ones.
>
> I do expect this problem to work itself out rather quickly, and then students will be able to identify partial functions, but loudly marking partial functions as partial seems like a small service to everyone and a bigger one to newbies. I don't see any downsides.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries