+1! Readability improvements are wonderful.

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Jon Purdy <evincarofautumn@gmail.com> wrote:

+1 from me, if only as a nice-to-have—it would be good to flesh out some standard type operators in general.


On Nov 1, 2016 4:14 PM, "Elliot Cameron" <eacameron@gmail.com> wrote:
Folks,

Has there been a discussion about adding a type-level operator "$" that just mimics "$" at the value level?

type f $ x = f x
infixr 0 $

Things like monad transformer stacks would look more "stack-like" with this:

type App = ExceptT Err $ ReaderT Config $ LogT Text IO

Elliot Cameron

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries


_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries




--
Jeff Brown | Jeffrey Benjamin Brown
Website   |   Facebook   |   LinkedIn(I often miss messages here)   |   Github