On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Nick Smallbone <nicsma@chalmers.se> wrote:
On Monday 07 April, 2014 at 04:32 pm, Johan Tibell wrote:
> > Just the implementation. However, another question (which I don't know
> > the answer to) is whether the type of StdGen allows for a proper
> > implementation of split.
> >
>
> It would be nice if we could just fix StdGen and thus not require a whole
> new library. Will fixing StdGen make it even slower than it is today?

That's the thing - I don't think anyone knows how to fix StdGen!

I was, perhaps naively, hoping that we could just take the implementation of tf-random and dump it into StdGen!