+0.1 from me.

These instances are awful but at least let's be consistent. 


On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 06:29 Fumiaki Kinoshita <fumiexcel@gmail.com> wrote:
I submitted https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/644 but it might be still controversial. I'd like to get more opinions again.

Here's the list of proposed instances:

Foldable ((,,) a b)
Foldable ((,,,) a b c)
Traversable ((,,) a b)
Traversable ((,,,) a b c)
Functor ((,,) a b)
(Monoid a, Monoid b) => Applicative ((,,) a b)
(Monoid a, Monoid b) => Monad ((,,) a b)
Functor ((,,,) a b c)
(Monoid a, Monoid b, Monoid c) => Applicative ((,,,) a b c)
(Monoid a, Monoid b, Monoid c) => Monad ((,,,) a b c)

The absence of Traversable instances for tuples feels quite inconsistent given that there are Bitraversable instances already.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries