The big problem is that when it was broken off into containers, there was no attempt to add appropriate abstraction barriers. So it's ... awkward.
> I've actually wondered why Data.Graph existed since it is obviously not
> written for serious/heavy usage.
But it was!
As I understand, it was originally part of GHC
(ghc-0.29/ghc/compiler/utils/Digraph.lhs)
for computing SCCs (in the graph of dependencies of declarations).
So we can assume that it does this well.
And I guess it's used for the very same purpose in Cabal and Agda.
- J.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries