+1 from me, regardless of implementation.
I'm more than open to switching to a more efficient solution.-Edward_______________________________________________On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, David Feuer <david.feuer@gmail.com> wrote:The implementation could use some work. Something more like this, I think.
(<|>) = foldr (\x k ys -> x : k (drop 1 ys)) id
In pointless silliness, it's even
foldr ((. (. (maybe ([]) snd . uncons))) . (.) . (:)) id
On Jul 17, 2015 2:15 PM, "Edward Kmett" <ekmett@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Er.. I obviously meantinstance Alternative ZipList whereempty = ZipList []ZipList xs <|> ZipList ys = ZipList (xs ++ drop (length xs) ys)sorry for any confusion.On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett@gmail.com> wrote:The ZipList data type admits one legal Alternative instanceinstance Alternative ZipList wherepure = ZipList []ZipList xs <|> ZipList ys = ZipList (xs ++ drop (length xs) ys)The legality of this instance was first noted in http://people.cs.kuleuven.be/~tom.schrijvers/Research/papers/ppdp2015.pdfI propose adding this instance, which acts like a generalized version of the Alternative for Maybe, choosing with a left bias.Discussion Period: 2 weeks-Edward
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries