On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Ross Paterson <ross@soi.city.ac.uk> wrote:

text        base      bytestring     type in text (or equivalent if absent)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
break       -         breakSubstring Text -> Text -> (Text, Text)
breakBy     break     break          (Char -> Bool) -> Text -> (Text, Text)
breakEnd    -         -              Text -> Text -> (Text, Text)
-           -         breakEnd       (Char -> Bool) -> Text -> (Text, Text)
count       -         -              Text -> Text -> Int
-           -         count          Char -> Text -> Int
find        -         -              Text -> Text -> [(Text, Text)]
findBy      find      find           (Char -> Bool) -> Text -> Maybe Char
partitionBy partition -              (Char -> Bool) -> Text -> (Text, Text)
replicate   -         -              Int -> Text -> Text
-           replicate replicate      Int -> Char -> Text
spanBy      span      span           (Char -> Bool) -> Text -> (Text, Text)
split       -         -              Text -> Text -> [Text]
-           -         split          Char -> Text -> [Text]
splitBy     -         splitWith      (Char -> Bool) -> Text -> [Text]
unfoldrN    -         -              Int -> (a -> Maybe (Char, a)) -> a -> Text
-           -         unfoldrN       Int -> (a -> Maybe (Char, a)) -> a -> (Text, Maybe a)
zipWith     zipWith   -              (Char -> Char -> Char) -> Text -> Text -> Text
-           zipWith   zipWith        (Char -> Char -> a) -> Text -> Text -> [a]

* The -By suffix has been used for predicate versions in 5 cases here,
 but not for filter and findIndex.

In the case of filter, that's because a filter function that didn't accept a predicate wouldn't be useful. I added findIndex for completeness back when that was the tack I was taking, but it arguably shouldn't be present at all, since it's subsumed by find.

* The find function has no connection with findBy.  It ought to have a
 name that is the plural of the name of the break function.

Again, this is present for completeness, and makes little obvious sense to retain.