On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Ian Lynagh <igloo@earth.li> wrote:
> We've made a list of which repos we suggest should be converted, and
> which should be mirrored, here:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/DarcsConversion#Planforlibraries
>
> Can you please let us know if you think any of the repos have been put
> in the wrong category?

Lennart Kolmodin (CCed) has created a Git version of binary he's now
working out of:

https://github.com/kolmodin/binary

I don't know if he intends it to become the new upstream location. Lennart?

I see that there is now a repo on github: https://github.com/ghc/packages-binary

However, it's a completely different conversion from darcs than the one I did earlier.

Please base the GHC copy of binary on the conversion I've already done, as both Johan and I have done work in this repo. You won't be able to pull the changes otherwise.

I think it might be a good idea to keep the copy of binary separate from the GHC copy, as GHC probably wants more stability than what we might provide in the short term future.

Regarding where the upstream location should be, I guess my repo is the current location where development is done.

It's not important to me that it's in my account though, as binary is a community effort. Maybe it should be based in some kind of Haskell Community account? If not, I'll keep it.

-- Lennart