+1 from me. 

Interestingly, it strikes me that the fingertree version of intercalate could be made more efficient, even if the sequence version can't.

-Edward

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 3:45 PM, David Feuer <david.feuer@gmail.com> wrote:

It seems there's enough interest to make it official. The usual two-week period begins now.

Intersperse can be given very pleasant performance characteristics for sequences: the result can constructed incrementally as it is consumed. Intercalate cannot perform so pleasantly, but it seems odd to add one but not the other.


_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries