That makes sense, I guess. Something like
data Handle a = Rethrow | Catch (IO a)
I suppose? My names are awful though.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, 1:23 a.m. David Feuer, <david.feuer@gmail.com> wrote:The catchJust and handleJust functions seem a bit weird and unidiomatic.
catchJust
:: Exception e
=> (e -> Maybe b) -- ^ Predicate to select exceptions
-> IO a -- ^ Computation to run
-> (b -> IO a) -- ^ Handler
-> IO a
catchJust p a handler = catch a handler'
where handler' e = case p e of
Nothing -> throwIO e
Just b -> handler bThis takes two functions and then puts them together. I would think the more natural API would be
catchMaybe :: Exception e => IO a -> (e -> Maybe (IO a)) -> IO a
catchMaybe m handler = catch m handler' where
handler' e = fromMaybe (throwIO e) (handler e)A point don't feel super strongly about, but feel I should raise, is that Nothing seems to be somewhat confusing. catchJust (\FileNotFound -> Nothing) seems to suggest that if FileNotFound occurs then nothing will happen, that is - the exception is ignored. However, that is not the case, rather than Nothing happening something certainly happens - an exception is (re)thrown!Whether or not this confusion is likely to happen in practice I don't know, but it suggests a type isomorphic to Maybe is a better fit.Ollie