Erik,

Here is the tally from the last time this came up.

http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-Add-amp-to-Data-Function-td5720703i60.html

At this point I think it mostly comes down to the core libraries decision, as this issue has been polled to death.

-Edward


On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Erik Hesselink <hesselink@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Wvv <vitea3v@rambler.ru> wrote:
> 2.1) Some people are against this function at all
> 2.2) Some people do not want to have this function, but not categorically
> 2.3) Few(?) people doesn't care
> 2.4) Many people wish to add flipped function application

I think this phrasing is too loaded given the actual numbers. I've
counted in this thread, being generous with the +1s (bikeshedding the
name counts as an implicit +1) and I find 11 in favor, 7 against and 6
unknown/don't care.

Erik
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries