It was mostly a joke. Sorry it wasn't understood that way.
Come on guys, let's keep it respectful, especially considering this is the libraries list. Lively debate is good, but it shouldn't turn to noise.
On Apr 2, 2017 1:33 AM, "Tony Morris" <tonymorris@gmail.com> wrote:
Join me in not caring about the names. Again, use the types.
It's triply hilarious that we have a typed programming language, and an
increasingly disproportionate user base who don't know how to use those
types. What is this? Amateur hour? Python exists.
On 02/04/17 18:22, Henrik Nilsson wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 01:56 AM, Tony Morris wrote:
>> length :: f a -> Int
>>
>> We immediately know that values of the kind (* -> *) slot in to the
>> value (f), with a kind checker to ensure we get it correct. Therefore,
>> we can easily reason about the length of values of kind ((,) a)
>>
>> I do find it hilarious that this discussion continued using the term
>> "tuple" as if to make a reasonable point. KIND ERROR.
>
> And it's doubly hilarious that that the above argument is put forward
> without any regard for picking an appropriate name for the concept,
> which most certainly is very different from "length" as used in
> everyday parlance, physics, mathematics, and any CS text-book on
> data-structures and algorithms I've ever seen.
>
> Best,
>
> /Henrik
>
>
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries