That would be fine.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:41 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:

I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that.

- Oleg

On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:

My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:

github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.

OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.

- Oleg

On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:

I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:

I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types
packages.

I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably
quickcheck-instances and aeson).

I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine
Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took
over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.

My first points of action would be:
- make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0,
bytestring-0.11) and
- move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in
case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others)
who will be able to act.

Best regards,
Oleg

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries