+1 for the Farkas-Dyck patch. Someone should check the performance of the replacement filterM, though: those loops may have been there for a reason that is still valid.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:51 AM Edward Kmett <ekmett@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 from me. 

-Edward

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fumiaki Kinoshita <fumiexcel@gmail.com> wrote:
I noticed that traceM is generalized to use Applicative. Then, how about replicateM/replicateM_?

I don't quite like confusing names, but is better than needlessly restrictive.

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries


_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries