This is a good point were we adding it to base. It’s already in base and widely useful!

That’s a good motivation to add for fixing num and friends. But that’s not even a new problem for num instances in base. Reexport it from prelude doesn’t change that. Just improves the ergonomics for using a really nice type for both pedagogy and prototyping! 

I also like how natural throws an error on underflow. 

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 12:54 PM David Feuer <david.feuer@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm going to play devil's advocate and say no. I believe Num instances should be rings under + and *. Natural is an instance of Num but is not a ring.

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021, 11:26 AM Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald@gmail.com> wrote:
This seems long overdue and aside from some redundant import warnings likely low breakage risk


Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries