The Proxy instance for Eq and Ord is deliberately lazy for the same sort of reason.

It is, simply, the maximally defined version of the function and, like it or not, folks with good intentions but bad design sense often still pass undefineds for Proxy arguments when they are used to older APIs that didn't take proxies.

The lazy version of each of these when inlined can eliminate whole code paths that would otherwise be compiled.

-Edward

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd caution against randomly changing Eq and Ord for Void to be less defined in the ill-considered name of consistency.

We rather deliberately made them as "defined as possible" back in 2012 after a very long discussion in which the pendulum swung the other way using a few examples where folks tied knots with fixed points to get inhabitants of Void and it was less consistent to rule them out than it was to define equality on _|_ to be True.

I'd challenge that nothing is gained by making these combinators strict in their arguments.

-Edward

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@gnu.org> wrote:
On 2015-07-16 at 05:28:03 +0200, David Feuer wrote:
> It's all a bit weird. I think the Proxy instance is lazy too. I would tend
> to think that empty types shouldn't have these instances, and that if they
> do that should be strict (empty case), but I can't prove that's the right
> way.

Btw, something similiar came up for deepseq, regarding NFData instances
for types only inhabited by ⊥ (and the issue of H2010 forbidding
instance auto-derivation for constructor-less types was mentioned too):

 https://github.com/haskell/deepseq/pull/1#issuecomment-61914093

-- hvr