I'd enjoy that I think! btw, ErikD pointed out an interesting family of RNGs yesterday
http://www.pcg-random.org/ (though any new major version revisions of random should have a much more substantial test suite we need to run before doing a release, but thats a discussion for another time : ) )

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Dominic Steinitz <dominic@steinitz.org> wrote:
Edward Kmett <ekmett <at> gmail.com> writes:

>  Emboldened by this success, we have a few other packages with which
> we'd like to do the same: * random  We've had some truly excellent
> work done over the last couple of years on how to deal with
> "splitting" a random number generator in a cryptographically sound
> manner. I spent some time cleaning up a few outstanding issues for
> this package personally over the summer, but have not had nearly
> enough time to devote to the issue of how to integrate the outcome
> of the recent research on splitting, while simultaneously caring
> about performance and soundness.

I'd like to throw my hat in the ring and become a co-maintainer
also. I use random numbers a lot for various Monte Carlo simulations.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries