Hi,

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Henning Thielemann
<lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Ross Paterson wrote:
>
>> This proposal seems to have got stuck.  Everyone wants an infix operator,
>> but we can't agree what it should be.

This proposal seems to have got stuck *again*.

This is a call for consensus. Do we agree to add

   infixr 6 <>

   (<>) :: Monoid m => m -> m -> m
   (<>) = mappend

If so I have a patch for base and GHC ready.

-- Johan

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

I already use this synonym a lot, but I currently have to define it each time. So, I agree in accept this proposal.

--
Daniel Díaz