I urge everyone to direct all further comments on this topic to the current chair of the CLC. There is nothing to be gained from public discussion of a "personnel" matter.

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020, 10:03 AM Profpatsch <mail@profpatsch.de> wrote:

I posted this comment on the thread of
https://github.com/haskell/random/pull/62#issuecomment-638088258

Since it was deleted and the comment thread locked by Carter,
I am escalating this request to the mailing list, where it cannot be
deleted.

Profpatsch <notifications@github.com> writes:

> @cartazio Please take even a fleeting look at https://github.com/idontgetoutmuch/random/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed, notice the amount of discussion and the timeline.
>
> This is the full-time work of a team of half a dozen of experts, probably breaching one man-year of effort, easily.
> It cannot just be discarded out of hand.
>
> I have been following the discussions (spread over mailinglists, issue trackers and elsewhere), and I propose you hand over maintainership of `random` as a base package.

A parallel issue with relevant discussion can be found at
https://github.com/haskell/random/pull/61

I am writing this email from my personal account, because I fear for
the health of the Haskell ecosystem, and I think Carter’s behaviour is
extremely detrimental to it.

I think a lot of other people feel the same way, so I encourage you to
add your voice publicly.

~ Profpatsch
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries