+1

Conrad.

On Oct 3, 2011 3:50 PM, "Malcolm Wallace" <malcolm.wallace@me.com> wrote:
>>> +1 for both .Strict and .Lazy.
>>
>> +1 as well from me
>
> +1 from me.
>
>> (Just wondering: would there be a transitional compatibility layer, or
>> would all user-code have to change the Data.Map imports at once with the
>> new containers version implementing this proposal?)
>
> I assume that Data.Map will essentially re-export everything from Data.Map.Lazy, and if you have used a prime'-ed-for-strictness variant, then you will need to add an import of Data.Map.Strict, qualify the function, and remove the prime.
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>