Hello,

I propose "single" (Single#), as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuple#Names_for_tuples_of_specific_lengths

I think it makes a bit more sense than "solo".

Olivier



2018-04-25 10:28 GMT+02:00 Simon Peyton Jones via Libraries <libraries@haskell.org>:

Dear Libraries Committee

Some time ago Andrew Martin asked you what the name of the unary unboxed one-tuple type and data constructor should be.  The thread ran for a while, but you never came to a conclusion.

Can we nail this one?   You’ll see on Trac #14673 that chessai wants me to decide 😊.  But it should really be you.

To me, there seems to be something of a consensus around Solo#.

Simon

PS: actually I think Andrew may have addressed libraries@ rather than core-libraries-committee@ by mistake.


_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries