On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 11:05:27 AM Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:

+1, as I don't see a downside. However, I don't think this change is a sufficient change as long as stack traces are only available for profiled builds. I still wish something like rewrite-with-location[1], which even addresses explicit stack traces directly[2]. IIRC, last time that feature was brought up for discussion, it stalled due to disagreements on the right design.

I think we have something of a consensus forming around https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ExplicitCallStack/ImplicitLocations, see #9049.   It’s simple, non-invasive, and predicatable.  It does need someone to implement it though.   Simon Hengel is thinking about implementing it.  (He is the one who also suggested “rewrite with location”).

 

So I think we are stalled not so much on design but on implementation.

 

Simon



That's great news, thanks for the update. I was not aware of that proposal.

Michael