Just to add my 2ct that it definitely don't work well for Scala.

That being said, it should be possible to have some nice UI/UX to help investigate such things... but the approach Scala documentation is using is definitely not ideal.


On 24 June 2014 17:20, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk> wrote:
Do you have anything specific in mind here? At first I was just going to
dismiss this as wishful thinking but perhaps we could actually do
something about this.

Maybe we could provide ‘alternative’ signatures which would make types
more specific with some (which? all of known ones?) instances.

You can already see how that works out with Scala documentation, which is an incomprehensible mess.

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries




--
A\ois
http://twitter.com/aloiscochard
http://github.com/aloiscochard