We discovered during quickchecking that a monad associativity law can fail. And that it's a semantic bug, not an implementation bug. I don't know whether Freddie is running into this same issue or something else. - Conal
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Jake McArthur <jake.mcarthur@gmail.com> wrote:
Freddie Manners wrote:Yes, this is a known problem. Event is not a Monad. I don't think there are plans to correct it any time soon. My personal preference is to pretend that Event has no Monad instance.
I've hit a rather fundamental problem: it seems Event doesn't obey the Monad laws.
- Jake_______________________________________________
Reactive mailing list
Reactive@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/reactive