That definition looks right to me, Peter. Nice job! - Conal
Just to be curious, what would be the definition of withSubs? Something likewithSubs :: [a] -> Event b -> Event (b,a)withSubs xs = (fmap.fmap) head . stateE xs tail
Haven't tested it, still actively learning reactive...2008/11/18 Conal Elliott <conal@conal.net>
Also, a less forgetful version of subs might be useful:
withSubs xs e :: [a] -> Event b -> Event (b,a)
and then
subs xs e = snd <$> withSubs xs e
or, if you like,
subs = (fmap.fmap.fmap) snd withSubs
Btw, you can read the three fmaps directly from the signature of withSubs (two arrows plus one Event on the way to the pair).
- ConalOn Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Conal Elliott <conal@conal.net> wrote:
Cool! Thanks to quicksilver for the insight on and elegant definition of subs.
How about one of the following terser variations on the randomEvent def:
randomEvent std e = subs (randoms g) e
randomEvent std = subs (randoms g)
randomEvent = subs . randoms
- Conal2008/11/18 Creighton Hogg <wchogg@gmail.com>
Being a dirty schlub & replying to myself, it turns out there is a way to substitute an infinite list into an Event as we've talked about this on #haskell this morning.
subs xs e :: [a] -> Event b -> Event a
subs xs e = head <$> accumE xs (tail <$ e)
so then we can very easily do
randomEvent :: (RandomGen g,Random b) => g -> Event a -> Event b
randomEvent std e = let vals = randoms g in subs vals e
Cool!
Now I just need to change my Tetris to do that instead of messing with a Behavior.
_______________________________________________
Reactive mailing list
Reactive@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/reactive
_______________________________________________
Reactive mailing list
Reactive@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/reactive