I would mind, for the reason I just outlined :-)
On 20 September 2012 17:57, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas@gmail.com> wrote:BTW if nobody minds the extra dependency, I would probably accept a
> toLower :: Word8 -> Word8
> toLower w
> | 65 <= w && w <= 90 ||
> 192 <= w && w <= 214 ||
> 216 <= w && w <= 222 = w + 32
> | otherwise = w
patch that replaces these numbers by nicer looking symbols from your
word8 package.