Sure, will do both.

How comprehensive should the header list be?

Am 04.02.2011 11:05 schrieb "Michael Snoyman" <michael@snoyman.com>:

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Aristid Breitkreuz
<aristidb@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Writing this ...

Yes, for functions I don't care what you name things. It's
specifically data constructors that breaks backwards compatibility.

> Headers are already there, no? You're confusing me.

I was talking about the semi-exhaustive list of headers that people
often request, eg hdrAccept = "Accept", hdrContentType =
"Content-Type", etc. It was brought up in the original thread.

> Thanks for the nice feedback!
>
> Aristid
> "sent from my Android"
>
> Am 04.02.2011 07:09 schrie...