On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 22:25, Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com> wrote:
beyond what is already done in xmobar itself. There's also the question
of whether an X11-Xrandr package makes more sense (Xinerama is already
there, but xft isn't). I imagine xmobar would also pick up the code that
gets put into X11 or X11-Xrandr for its Xrandr needs instead of its own
bindings if/when that happens.

There's already an X11-xft package (which includes Render (not RandR) support; I'm not sure if that belongs there).  As to RandR, my inclination is that it should be part of X11, not a separate package — as long as the package continues to work in the absence of RandR.

--
brandon s allbery                                      allbery.b@gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms