Hi,<div><br></div><div>I am quite new to xmonad, but I find it quite useful :D (compared to my window-dragging coworkers, who don&#39;t see the sense :D)</div><div><br></div><div>The story is:</div><div>I have a working dual-screen setup, where each screen is a workspace. This is probably the most default way to have it...</div>

<div><br></div><div>My problem is, that I mostly work with apps that produce a lot of windows. This is the first reason why I have dual-screen setup after all...</div><div>So I arrange nicely all the windows on the two screens (say [1] and [2]), but I also work with multiple instances of the application. That means I have another application (with similarly-looking windows) on screens [2] and [3]. And another on [4][5]. And another.... Now here&#39;s the catch:</div>

<div>When I want to switch to the other project (2,3) i need to change BOTH workspaces (say: mod-w,mod-3, mod-e,mod-4). Then to go back the procedure repeats.</div><div><br></div><div>This is annoying...</div><div>It is even more annoying if I forget on which dual-workspaces my apps were, and I mess instance 1 with instance 2 (say have workspaces [1] and [4]). Then my app responds in silly way (of course) and I don&#39;t see why...</div>

<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>So the question is:</div><div>Is it possible to have a setup with &#39;dual-screen,dual-sub-workspace&#39; workspaces? So to have [1][2] merged in [super1] and [3][4] merged into [super2] ?</div>

<div>So when I switch to [super1] i get [1][2], and so on... </div><div><br></div><div>It could be that [1][2] is merged into a big [1] (but preserving the mod-w,mod-e functionality!! That&#39;s a must!), so that (mod-shift-1) would move some other window to that workspace... I don&#39;t mind that it would end up in either say [1a] or [1b], that I can manage later ;)</div>

<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks and regards,</div><div>Kuba</div><div><br></div>